SRS Poster Presentation Evaluation Form

If you signed up as an evaluator for a Poster Session, you'll be using this rubric to review the posters:

Evaluator Best Practices:

1. Comments Matter: Use comment boxes as they make feedback more human.

2. Stay Positive: Mention at least one good thing about the presentation.

3. Be a Pronoun Pro: When referring to the student, use "you," e.g., "Your poster was well designed."

Good luck! 

SCALE: 1-5 (1-Poor, 5-Excellent)

5 – Excellent: Exceptional performance; exceeds expectations; clear mastery
4 – Very Good: Strong performance; minor areas for improvement
3 – Good: Competent and meets expectations
2 – Fair: Needs improvement; some weaknesses evident
1 – Poor: Significant weaknesses; does not meet expectations

How well did the presenter establish the significance and relevance of the project to the audience?

1  2  3  4  5

How effectively did the presenter explain key concepts and answer questions?

1  2  3  4  5

Comments: _________________________________________

How clear and well-defined were the project's purpose and methodology?

1  2  3  4  5

How well did the presenter communicate logical reasoning and conclusions?

1  2  3  4  5

Comments: _________________________________________

How clearly organized was the information on the poster (title, introduction, methods, results, conclusions, references)?

1  2  3  4  5

How intuitive was the overall flow and structure of the presentation?

1  2  3  4  5

Comments: _________________________________________

How effective were the poster visuals (figures, charts, tables, readability)?

1  2  3  4  5

How visually appealing and easy to read was the poster's design?

1  2  3  4  5

Comments: _________________________________________

How well did the poster incorporate, summarize, and cite relevant source material?

1  2  3  4  5

How accurate and appropriate were the citation formats used?

1  2  3  4  5

Comments: _________________________________________

How confident, composed, and clear was the presenter during the evaluation?

1  2  3  4  5

How well did the presenter engage the audience (eye contact, projection, and enthusiasm)?

1  2  3  4  5

Comments: _________________________________________

Final comments: _____________________________________________